Writing and speaking about your code might actually make it better

I like to think I’m a smart guy, but I know there are many people out there who are smarter than I am. Sometimes, just thinking about Kathy and Julian showing us what we can do in Java in 10 Lines or Less helps one tighten up some code. Other times, sitting down to write about a code problem or a solution might actually make your code better.

Our workflow application builds a list of approvers at each step that’s built from three fields on the workflow step configuration document. That list is stored on the document being approved so that we don’t have to do a lookup to determine who can take action. Sometimes, the approvers might be in more than one of those fields and thus, with sloppy coding, end up in the approver list more than once. The workflow step configuration allows us to choose which of those three fields is used to notify approvers (it could even be all three fields). Since we recently decided to keep track of who is notified, since they are the primary approver(s), the workflow code is now recording the names of those notified as it sends the message. Because the system is already used in 15 projects and will be used in 70+ projects at time in the future, it must be a highly configurable workflow.

My coding challenge was simple. I wanted to display on the XPage the primary approver(s) and the other (proxy) approvers, as separate lists. This is probably a two-minute exercise for someone who knows what they’re doing, so it took me an hour.

Because I worried about the duplicates, I didn’t use the remove method of the java.util.Vector, which would only take out the first instance of the duplicate. I lamented this, since playing with arrays is a little more involved. Basically, I decided to build the array by looping through looking for matches. Then, I was puzzled about how to find array elements in a Vector, but I got over that when I realized that I could use @Unique to clean both and make them both arrays! OK, not the best idea, but it worked.

<xp:label id="recipientListLabel">
var recipients=procureDoc.getDocument().getItemValue("RecipientList");
return "Approvers: " + @Unique(@Name("[CN]",recipients)); }]]></xp:this.value>
<xp:label id="proxyListLabel">
var recipients = @Unique ( procureDoc.getDocument().getItemValue("RecipientList") );
var allApprovers = @Unique ( procureDoc.getDocument().getItemValue("TSWFCurApprovers") ); 
ar proxies = [];
for ( approver in allApprovers ) { 
	if ( @IsNotMember( allApprovers[approver], recipients) ) { 
		proxies.push ( allApprovers[approver] ); 
var proxyList = @Implode(@Name("[CN]",proxies),", "); 
return "Proxy Approvers: " + proxyList; }]]></xp:this.value>

I was pretty happy with that, because I thought it would take me a lot of extensive looping and nonsense (since a quick search hadn’t revealed an array minus array code snippet.

But, as I sat down to write about this and see if someone could better it (assuming that it would take someone two minutes), I returned to the documentation. I just wanted to double-check that remove was a “method” and that I wasn’t being foolish and calling it a “function” instead. So, then, I saw it. The code simplifier. removeAll was exactly what I was looking for and, I’d bet, something every Java coder worth their salt could have slapped on the problem in an instant. Learning curve.

<xp:label id="proxyListLabel">
var recipients:java.util.Vector = procureDoc.getDocument().getItemValue("RecipientList");
var allApprovers:java.util.Vector = procureDoc.getDocument().getItemValue("TSWFCurApprovers");

var proxyList = @Implode(@Name("[CN]",allApprovers),", ");
return "Proxy Approvers: " + proxyList; }]]></xp:this.value>

It’s always good to learn. When I was a Scoutmaster, one of the things I told the older Scouts was that by teaching skills, they ended up learning them even better themselves. So, as I sat down to write this, more to share the experience than to teach, I ended up learning more. It forced me to research a little, to make sure I was covering my bases and allowed me to cut some inelegant code from 8 lines to 5 (though I imagine the daring would simply cut it to 2 lines).

So, next time you or your boss thinks there’s no time for writing up your thoughts on coding, or no time to speak at conferences, or no time to share your ideas at the local user group meeting, remember that you’re likely to end up with better code even if you’re the only one who contributes. The process forces it on you.

Categories: Java, Server-Side Javascript, Xpages | Tags: , , , , , | 2 Comments

Syntax errors will be the death of us all in #XPages

I upgraded one of our databases overseas and was puzzled when they reported that they suddenly could no longer see the attachments to their purchase orders. Actually, when I heard it, it was just for a single purchase order.

You see, we’ve got our attachments all stored in a separate database for each project. This is nice because it reduces the risk of truncations, moves the big data out of the main database and generally calms down the Notes admin team. However, it does require that there is a solid link between the main document and any attachment documents. Our main link is a transactionKey field, which identifies not only which main document the attachment belongs to, but also where that attachment is displayed on the main document’s XPage.

I had a custom control that handled one of those display areas as a tab in a tabbed panel. We had decided to add a new document type (release orders, to go with purchase orders), so I wanted my custom control to be more generic, to handle multiple document types. There are a few values that were based on the document type. Rather than passing 4 or 5 properties, I decided to pass in 1 and compute the others. Brilliant, except, I forgot how Javascript works.

My “brilliant” code….

<xp:scriptBlock id="scriptBlock1">
	<xp:this.value><![CDATA[#{javascript:switch ( compositeData.mainDocumentType ) {
case "Purchase Order":
	viewScope.signedDocumentTypes = "Purchase Order or subcontract";
	viewScope.transactionType = "PurchaseRecord";
	viewScope.transactionTag = "po";
	viewScope.additionalDirections = " and all invoices and goods delivery receipts";
case "Release Order":
	viewScope.signedDocumentTypes = "Release Order";
	viewScope.transactionType = "ReleaseOrder";
	viewScope.transactionTag = "rel";
	viewScope.additionalDirections = "";
	// thus far, BPA only, but could be any mainDocumentType with no spaces in the name
	viewScope.signedDocumentTypes = compositeData.mainDocumentType;
	viewScope.transactionType = compositeData.mainDocumentType;
	viewScope.transactionTag = @LowerCase(compositeData.mainDocumentType);
	viewScope.additionalDirections = "";

So, every Purchase Order attachment got the signedDocumentTypes ‘Purchase Order’, the type ‘Purchase Order’, the tag ‘purchase order’ and no additional directions. Only took about 4 hours of looking at data, chasing the various design changes and reading code before I looked at that piece of code and realized my obvious mistake.

Sometimes, you just need a break;

Categories: Server-Side Javascript, Xpages | Tags: , | Leave a comment

Videotapes of #MWLUG2015

The whirlwind of MWLUG has passed for 2015. It was an outstanding conference, giving me an opportunity to explore a lot of new technologies, to learn some new techniques and to spend time with the peers that I usually only encounter online. I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, the greatest benefit of these conferences is sharing ideas and discussing issues outside the sessions. While you can get a good exposure to the information watching the videos, it’s never as much as you get from everyone being there. Additionally, my video list is subject to my own tastes. As such, it leans heavily toward development. I won’t apologize for that, but encourage anyone else who wants to start videotaping the administration sessions to do so.

I took my trusty video camera along, remembering to pack my best tripod this time. I’m not sure it’s so evident with the 2014 videos, but I’m not a good self-leveling cameraman. My Sunpak 70″ Ultra 7000TM Tripod has two bubble-levels and rises above the crowd, even when they’re standing. This is most helpful when I’m at the back of a big room and people need to walk in front of the camera. It probably also helps a little in assuring a better angle for the footage – nothing worse than staring up at the speaker. My Canon DM-50 Directional Stereo Microphone might actually be the coolest piece of equipment in the bundle (the Canon HG10 AVCHD video camera is old, but not cheap) and having found the back cover, it worked like a champ in Atlanta. The vaulted ceilings in Grand Rapids last year may have hindered the quality of the sound, but missing the cover couldn’t have helped. I might look at adding wireless microphones or getting some lights, since I know I can improve the image and sound quality further, though I be better served by buying some books and getting a steadier hand! Checking a few videos, I know I need more attention to lighting for certain, if not actual lights of my own.

The important thing today is to share our whole suite of videos from the conference. You could jump right to the entire MWLUG playlist, which includes some sessions from 2014, or use the chronological list here:

Wednesday sessions

CS101: Entrepreneurs Roundtable – What “They” Never Tell You About Owning a Business panel moderated by Lisa Duke
BP103: Let the Phoenix Rise: Rationalise your IBM Domino environment by Arshad Khalid and Stephanie Heit
AD108: Move Your XPages to the Fast Lane by Howard Greenberg

Opening General Session
“Everything Starts From A Dot”: The Elements and Principles of Design as the Visual Link to Innovation by Katherine Rhodes Fields
Establishing a New Culture of Design by Adam Cutler
IBM ESS Strategy Roadmap and Radar: A New Way to Work by Kramer Reeves and Peter Janzen

Thursday sessions

AD109: Navigating the Jungle of Modern Web Development by Shean McManus
The Greater Good of Social Collaboration by Louis Richardson
AD101: App.Next: The Future of Domino Application Development by Pete Janzen
AD107: Maven: An Exhortation and Apology by Jesse Gallagher
IV102: Graphs in Action by Nathan T Freeman

Friday sessions

AD117: Web Sockets – “Pushing” the web forward by Mark Roden
AD106: Just a View: An Introduction To Model-View-Controller Pattern by Ulrich Krause
AD114:Take Your XPages Development to the Next Level by Brad Balassaitis and Paul Calhoun
AD112: Real World Experience: Integrating DB2 with XPages by Steve Zavocki and Dwain Wuerfel
AD101: Design Matters by Keith Strickland and Bob Kadrie

All 16 videos published within a week. Last Wednesday at this time, Howard was wrapping up his session so that we could head down to the Exhibitors’ Showcase Reception. While all of these have gone out on twitter, there will be more postings and linkings to come. I think most of the slide decks are on people’s sites and some them have linked directly to the videos already. So, almost all of the 2015 work is done.

Spoke to my boss about MWLUG 2016 in Austin and she’s all in favor of it. Looking forward to seeing 250 of you there and many more of you in Orlando at the end of January. Now, if I can just get some work done on a session for Connect by the end of next week, I’ll be golden!

Categories: Conferences, Videos | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

What “They” Never Tell You About Owning a Business #MWLUG2015

Just over six years ago, my lovely and talented wife, Melissa Henderson left behind her employers and struck out on her own. Well, not alone. She brought along Joy Ruffin, who’d moved with her from Russell Reynolds to Gilbert Tweed. Oh, and she brought me, though I kept my day job. While our friend Joy isn’t with the company any more, it has grown far beyond using a spare bedroom as corporate headquarters. There have been a lot of lessons along the way, so when Lisa Duke’s session for MWLUG 2015 was announced, I put Melissa in touch with her. Melissa often travels with me to my conferences (and I sometimes to hers, since both of us can work from anywhere), so it seemed a perfect fit. Now, my wife will be on a panel at a technical conference before I’ve done it myself!

CS101: Entrepreneur’s Roundtable: What “They” Never Tell You About Owning a Business
Have you ever considered going out on your own as a consultant (or worry that one day your company may “liberate” you and you may need to contract between permanent jobs)? What are the common pitfalls to avoid? What’s involved? And with all that, what perks are there to make it worthwhile? Join the discussion from seasoned small business owners both inside and outside the IT world to share your experiences and learn from others.

I’m very much looking forward to the session, not just to see her speak (and videotape it, as I do several sessions at each MWLUG), but to hear the experience of the other entrepreneurs. As the spouse and sounding board for her, it will really help me her her in the future.

So, if you enjoy the session, make sure to introduce yourself and feel free to buy her a glass of French wine!

Categories: Conferences | Tags: , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using the namePicker from the Extension Library in #XPages

One of the things that always seemed weak to me about my Domino web implementations was the selection and display of names. Now that XPages turns our work into the creation of actual web pages, the tools available are so much better and extend the flexibility of Notes development into the 21st century.

OK, saying “21st century” doesn’t sound as cool now that we’re halfway through the second decade, but since so much of what I’d done looked like it was designed in 1995, getting out of 20th century web development is a big step for me!

There are two control types from the Extension Library that are relevant here: the Dojo Name Text Box and the Name Picker.

The Dojo Name Text Box gives us that modern, Facebook-style name display, including a little “x” to delete the name from the list:


The Name Picker is very flexible. In my code example, I wanted users to be able to select from a view in the database, from the corporate NAB or, if they’re using XPiNC, from their personal address book. One of the nice thing about the picker is that if you supply multiple dataProviders, it provides a picklist of those choices, but if you only supply one (or if only one is ‘loaded’) then it doesn’t display the picklist of address books, allowing the user to just use the one NAB you’ve set as a dataProvider. It’s nice when you don’t have to tell the control the obvious things.

When you are setting up the namePicker, you need to select your dataProvider(s). There are three types (beanNamePicker, dominoNABNamePicker and dominoViewNamePicker) and the aggregator for using multiple providers (namePickerAggregator). As you can see in the example, if you choose the aggregator, you then identify your dataProviders inside that aggregator.

The dominoNABNamePicker is likely the one that’s most used, so also has a few pre-set configuration choices. While there are six parameters you could use, you can choose just to use two: addressBookSel and nameList.

  • For addressBookSel, you’re choosing between broad options: all, all-public, all-private, first, first-public, or db-name. Because our environment includes an address book for non-staff folks, I didn’t choose either all or all-public, which would have included that address book. So, I went with db-name, which allows you to specify the database name. The broader categories will work for you if you don’t have the requirement to leave out one of the address books.
  • For nameList, you also get some choices that are functional and make things easy for you: people, peopleByLastName, groups, or peopleAndGroups. This overrides two of the other parameters – groups and people, who are both boolean values. Using people as the nameList value returns people by first name, which can be a little annoying if you have thousands of choices, so it’s nice that peopleByLastName has beeen added.
  • The addressBookDb parameter only matters if you’ve selected db-name as the addressBookSel value. In my case, when the user is accessing our database in XPiNC on the local replica, their personal address book is names.nsf and the corporate one is minnames.nsf, so I’m doing a little trickery to give them all the options. I suppose I could have specified the corporate NAB and then used all-private to get to the personal address book, but I didn’t think of that first.
  • The loaded parameter is the most powerful one here for me, since it would allow me to provide the user more or fewer choices based on a formula. In this instance, the choice is only based on which client they’re using, but I could imagine basing it on roles, on values on the document or any variety of other things.
  • As mentioned above, the boolean values for groups and people are overridden by the value of nameList, so I’d avoid using them. Confusion is the likely result.

I was especially happy that using a view within the existing database in the namePicker was so simple. All I had to do was create a view that had the values I wanted in the first column, sorted ascending (I assume descending works as well, but that would be user-unfriendly). The dominoViewNamePicker is simple – really you only need to specify the databaseName and viewName. My samples view was in the same database, but you can point it elsewhere. There is a loaded parameter for your use and you can choose a label for the pick list when using multiple dataProviders.

							<xe:djextNameTextBox id="approversNameTextBox" value="#{deliverableDoc.Approvers}">
							<xe:namePicker id="approversNamePicker" for="approversNameTextBox" listHeight="300px" listWidth="150px"
								pickerText="Click to select technical approver" rendered="#{javascript:deliverableDoc.isEditable();}">
											<xe:dominoViewNamePicker label="Contacts" viewName="ContactsNotesName">
											<xe:dominoNABNamePicker nameList="people" addressBookSel="db-name" addressBookDb="names.nsf">
											<xe:dominoNABNamePicker nameList="people" addressBookSel="db-name" addressBookDb="minnames.nsf">
												<xe:this.loaded><![CDATA[${javascript:@ClientType() == "Notes";}]]></xe:this.loaded>

Unfortunately, I know very little about beans, so I’ll leave discussion of that to someone else, or to a future post if I can follow Russ Maher’s example and get into using Beans wherever they’re useful. The more tools you have in the box, the quicker and more flexibly you can get your work done.

Categories: Extension Library, Utilities, Xpages | Tags: , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Quick look at dialogContent and dialogButtonBar in #XPages

One of the challenges of XPages is figuring out what controls actually do. In a prior post, I wrote about using a dialog to return values to the XPage. It never occurred to me to use dialogContent and dialogButtonBar in the dialog. Today, when I was creating another dialog, I used the palette to find the dialog control and noticed those two. I wondered what they did, since, in my example, I hadn’t used them and my dialog displayed easily.

I checked the documentation, which really doesn’t help, stating simply that the dialogButtonBar “Contains buttons in a dialog.” That sure doesn’t tell me why I should use it instead of just putting my controls right into the dialog.

So, I did a little test.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xp:view xmlns:xp="http://www.ibm.com/xsp/core" xmlns:xe="http://www.ibm.com/xsp/coreex">
	<xp:link escape="true" text="Add a Linkage" id="addLinkageLink">
		<xp:image url="/plus.png" id="addLinkageImage" style="position:relative;left:2px;top:-2px;margin-right:5px;">
		<xp:eventHandler event="onclick" submit="false">
	<xp:link escape="true" text="Add without content control" id="link1">
		<xp:image url="/plus.png" id="image1" style="position:relative;left:2px;top:-2px;margin-right:5px;">
		<xp:eventHandler event="onclick" submit="false">
	<xe:dialog id="linkageDialog" title="Add linkage">
		<xe:dialogContent id="dialogContent1">
			<xp:label value="Label" id="label1"></xp:label>
			<xp:inputText id="inputText1"></xp:inputText>
		<xe:dialogButtonBar id="dialogButtonBar1">
			<xp:button value="OK" id="button1"></xp:button>
			<xp:button value="Cancel" id="button3">
				<xp:eventHandler event="onclick" submit="false">
	<xe:dialog id="contentFreeDialog">
		<xp:label value="Label" id="label2"></xp:label>
		<xp:inputText id="inputText2"></xp:inputText>
		<xp:button value="OK" id="button2"></xp:button>
		<xp:button value="Cancel" id="button4">
			<xp:eventHandler event="onclick" submit="false">

The dialog using the dialogContent and dialogButtonBar controls looks far nicer. I did put the title on the one without those sub-controls in order to make the disparity even more stark. When using the sub-controls, the placement of the content and the buttons is handled for you, without requiring the additional formatting I had to do in the prior post using a dialog. So, here’s the ugly one, which doesn’t use the sub-controls and will require some formatting:


And here’s the pretty one, with the sub-controls in use:


So, using the dialogContent and dialogButtonBar controls makes your life easier and your users happier.

Categories: Extension Library, Xpages | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Creating a meeting in the UI in #IBMNotes

When we tout the advantages of using Notes, one of the key points we always mention is the tight integration between Notes applications and Notes mail. Part of this ought to be tight integration with calendaring and scheduling. Oddly, I’ve never written an application that has any interface with the user’s calendar. This had to change. Our users wanted to be able to create a meeting notice from the Quarterly Project Review (QPR) document for that review, taking up the dates and participants from that document seamlessly into the notice. I scratched my head because I’d never even tried it, though I was sure it had to be easy.

So, I looked at what form was used by the meetings I attend. I must have clicked on a proposed meeting because I chose ‘Notice’. I just added a button on the QPR form to create and send Notice documents to the chair and each of the attendees. That looked like it worked because it would show up in people’s inboxes and they could click to accept or decline. Of course, it would disappear once that happened. Oops.

Not only that, but since many of the legacy Notes apps here use formula language to create messages in the UI for users to complete when requesting approvals, my users told me they really wanted to be able to edit the notice. I groused because I find that process inefficient. Users can choose to never send the email or change it in ways that are unexpected. I like approval requests to go silently or to allow the user to enter some additional text, but not to give them full control.

Fortunately, I figured out that I ought to using the Appointment form.

Determining the solution

As I learned more about their requirements, I realized that with all the things they wanted to be able to change, I should give in and simply open in the UI. The fact that any form in the mail template is endlessly complicated was a big incentive as well.

So, I searched the internet to see if anyone else had done this and only came up with a formula language method, which mostly worked, but not quite. Then, taking the formula language code as my example, I built a LotusScript agent that does a nice job of it.

I thought that I could first create the document as a NotesDocument object and then open it using the editDocument method of the NotesUIWorkspace object. I’m not sure if it was because I didn’t set the right fields or not enough fields, but it simply didn’t work when I tried it that way. So, I went the full monty and simply opened it as a NotesUIDocument right from the start.

Interestingly, when all I did was insert names into the required (EnterSendTo) and optional (EnterCopyTo) fields, we realized that you didn’t get to see their schedules to find the right time for the meeting. One of the testers found that clicking on the highlighted ‘Required’ would make them appear. So, checking that link reveals some curious formula language coding:

FIELD EnterSendTo:= @Trim(EnterSendTo);
FIELD EnterCopyTo:= @Trim(EnterCopyTo);
FIELD EnterBlindCopyTo:= @Trim(EnterBlindCopyTo);
@Command([EditGotoField]; "EnterSendTo");
@Command([EditInsertText]; " ");
@Command([EditGotoField]; "EnterCopyTo");
@Command([EditInsertText]; " ");
@If(EnterBlindCopyTo!="" & @GetProfileField("CalendarProfile"; "showCalBCC") = "1";@Command([EditGotoField]; "EnterBlindCopyTo");"");
@If(EnterBlindCopyTo!="" & @GetProfileField("CalendarProfile"; "showCalBCC") = "1";@Command([EditInsertText]; " ");"");

So, it’s quirky. Using @Trim, I can understand, but why would it insert the blank space into the two fields? Then I noticed an event on each field.

Sub Onchange(Source As Field)
	If Not (cseventobj.m_note.IsNewNote) Then
		cseventobj.NeedsOLPTran = True
	End If
End Sub

So, the link runs formula language that kicks off the onChange event, which does additional processing. So, when coding one’s agent to create the appointment in the UI, just repeat what the formula language does, only in script. Thus, lines 90-94 in my agent make sense.

The final quirk is with my original QPR document. If the user was in read mode, the agent ran beautifully, but if they were in edit mode, I needed to make sure I had the values on the back end AND that the code didn’t ‘get confused’ with which uidoc was which. Perhaps it was something convoluted with my code, but I found it best if I put the QPR document back into read mode. Then, to avoid issues with how I’m recording the ‘history’ (noting on the QPR that someone created a meeting notice), I decided to close and reopen it in read only mode. Allowing it to be edited was creating confusion, since it threw odd prompts and might generate rep-save conflicts. As such, I’m doing an odd dance with values and objects on lines 50-55.

The agent

	Agent Send Calendar Invites
	Created Dec 23, 2014 by David Navarre/DAI
	Description: This Agent creates a calendar invite, listing participants and optional participants
Option Public
Option Declare
Use "Utilities"
Sub Initialize
	Dim session As New NotesSession
	Dim ws As New NotesUIWorkspace
	Dim thisdb As NotesDatabase
	Dim maildb As New NotesDatabase ( "", "" )
	Dim uidoc As NotesUIDocument
	Dim memoUIdoc As NotesUIDocument
	Dim qprDoc As NotesDocument
	Dim history As NotesRichTextItem
	Dim recipientName As NotesName
	Dim qprDate As Variant
	Dim qprTime As Variant
	Dim projectName As Variant
	Dim fiscalYearAndQuarter As Variant
	Dim participants As Variant
	Dim participantsOptional As Variant
	Dim timeString, dateString As Variant
	Dim answer As Variant
	Dim reason As String
	Dim unid As String

	On Error GoTo errorhandler
	Call StartAgentLogging ( session )

	Set thisdb = session.Currentdatabase

	Set uidoc = ws.Currentdocument

	reason = "This will create a meeting invite for you to send to participants."
	If uidoc.Editmode Then
		reason = reason + Chr$(10) + "The QPR will switch to read-only mode."
		reason = reason + Chr$(10) + "If you close and re-open it, you can edit it again."
	End If
	reason = reason + Chr$(10) + "Continue?"
	answer = ws.Prompt ( PROMPT_YESNO, "Continue?", reason )
	If answer = 0 Then
		Exit Sub
	End If	
	If uidoc.Editmode Then
		Call uidoc.Save()
		uidoc.Editmode = False
		Set qprDoc = uidoc.Document
		unid = qprDoc.Universalid
		Call uidoc.Close(True)
		Set qprDoc = thisdb.Getdocumentbyunid(unid)
		Set uidoc = ws.Editdocument(False, qprDoc, True)
		Set qprDoc = uidoc.Document
	End If
	Set qprDate = qprDoc.Getfirstitem("QPRDate")
	Set qprTime = qprDoc.Getfirstitem("QPRTime")
	timeString = qprTime.Text
	dateString = qprDate.Text
	Dim qprStartTime As New NotesDateTime ( timeString )

	Call maildb.Openmail()
	Set memoUIdoc = ws.Composedocument(maildb.Server, maildb.Filepath, "Appointment")
	projectName = qprDoc.Getitemvalue("ProjectName") 
	fiscalYearAndQuarter = qprDoc.Getitemvalue("FiscalYearAndQuarter") 
	Call memoUIdoc.Fieldsettext("Subject", fiscalYearAndQuarter(0) & " QPR: " & projectName (0) )

	Call memoUIdoc.Fieldsettext("STARTDATE", dateString )
	Call memoUIdoc.Fieldsettext("STARTTIME", timeString )
	Call memoUIdoc.Fieldsettext("ENDDATE", dateString )
	Call qprStartTime.Adjusthour(1, False)
	Call memoUIdoc.Fieldsettext("ENDTIME", qprStartTime.Timeonly)

	participants = qprDoc.Getitemvalue ( "Participants" )
	ForAll entry In participants
		Set recipientName = New NotesName ( entry )
		Call memoUIdoc.Fieldappendtext("EnterSendTo", recipientName.Abbreviated & Chr$(10) ) 
	End ForAll
	participantsOptional = qprDoc.Getitemvalue ( "ParticipantsOptional" )
	ForAll entry In participantsOptional
		Set recipientName = New NotesName ( entry )
		Call memoUIdoc.Fieldappendtext("EnterCopyTo", recipientName.Abbreviated & Chr$(10) ) 
	End ForAll

	Call memoUIdoc.Gotofield("EnterSendTo")
	Call memoUIdoc.Inserttext(" ")
	Call memoUIdoc.Gotofield("EnterCopyTo")
	Call memoUIdoc.Inserttext(" ")
	Call memoUIdoc.Gotonextfield()
	Set history = qprDoc.Getfirstitem("History")
	Call history.Appendtext(Now & " - Meeting notice created by " & session.Commonusername)
	Call history.Addnewline(1, True)
	Call qprDoc.Replaceitemvalue("NoticeFlag", 1)
	Call qprDoc.Save(True, False)
	Exit Sub
errorhandler:' report all errors in a messagebox
	reason = "Error #" & CStr (Err) & " (" & Error & ") on line " & CStr (Erl)
	MessageBox reason, 16, "Error"
	Call agentLog.LogAction ( reason )
	Resume exiting ' transfers control to the exiting label
End Sub

Final thoughts

I’m sure I can do this a bit more efficiently, but I’m pretty happy with this first foray into calendaring & scheduling. We’ll probably refine this a little and do more of it in our projects. Users always want to be able to skip re-typing everything and there’s no reason not to handle it for them. Of course, we’re likely to have to revise all of this once we move to Verse, but, as my father always said, “I’ll burn that bridge when I come to it.”

Categories: Old Notes | Tags: , , , | Leave a comment

Mastering #XPages: Buy the eBook

I’ve had my copy of Mastering XPages (2nd Edition) for a little while. It’s a darn heavy book, but because of that, it’s packed with information. More packed that the 1st Edition? Why, yes, yes it is. Mine is in hard cover and the 1100-plus pages is a little bit daunting to carry around. Nonetheless, there is nothing quite like it.

I’ve always been a guy who learns well from physical books. I like the feel of them. I like the structured approach to learning that they provide. The code examples in the text, along with great images, really provide a lot on insight to what you can do with XPages. I’d say it compares well with reading a variety of blogs because of the depth and structure provided. I can and do read dozens of blogs, but they don’t have any comprehensive structure. For example, I write mostly about the problems that I’ve encountered coding in XPages. While that might teach you a lot about XPages, it’s got no structure at all. If you read Marky’s blog, you’ll learn a lot, and often in a structured manner about the topic he’s dealing with, but it won’t take you from ground zero to XPages developer. Similarly, the extensive XPages library over at Notes in 9 is fantastic (and you ought to be watching all of those videos), but there’s not necessarily a comprehensive plan, nor a logical learning order. I love Paul Della-Nebbia’s video series, Intro to XPages, as it’s a great place to start learning, but you won’t get 21 chapters of knowledge there.

Now, before you start thinking it’s a massive slog of text with only hard-copy code samples, brace yourself. Just like the blogs noted above, you can download sample applications that go along with the examples in the book to help you learn all aspects of XPages.

In the months I’ve owned it, I’ve read several chapters straight through, used one chapter (18 – Internationalization) to add a huge capability to our applications with a mere hour of research and searched through the massive text for little bits and pieces.

This brings me to the electronic version. I’m old. I’ve admitted above to loving books. As I was pondering my review, I thought I needed to try the electronic version. So, using the code supplied in the hard-copy of the book, I added the electronic version to my tablet (Motorola Xoom that’s getting a bit long-in-the-tooth). I searched a little, which definitely beats the heck out of the hard copy’s index, since you can not only find more, but also jump directly to that spot in the text. I sat and read a little — I’ve already established that I’m willing to read books on it with military history — and it’s very nice. When you get into books over a thousand pages, it’s so much easier to tote around an electronic copy in your backpack, or read on the Metro, or pluck it out of your carry-on while flying to MWLUG. I highly recommend the electronic version. Depending on finances, I might not worry about the hard copy next time and simply get my hands on the e-book.

This edition adds in various changes from the release of the 1st edition — over 3 years of changes. It’s written in the irrepressible style that won Marky’s approval. It’s a jam-packed learning experience. If you don’t have it already, do yourself a favor and get a copy today. Try the electronic version. You’ll thank me.

Categories: Xpages | Tags: , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Configurable notification agent in #OldNotes

Shockingly, when I arrived at my current company, they had basically NO scheduled agents at all. Apparently, someone had decided long ago that scheduled agents were dangerous, that they would overwhelm and crash the servers. So, whenever anything was done, it was done manually. This even extended to user notifications. That is, if I submitted a document for approval, there was some formula language that would populate a new notification message in the client and the user would fill in any extra details before clicking send. I was shocked. As I’ve modified designs, I’ve been adding background notifications and also scheduled agents. Our main project management database, which our field offices use copies of to manage their projects, hasn’t been mine to modify, since it’s already working and there is a team that customizes the design for each field office.

As we’ve been delving further into XPages and as I’ve been spreading the good word about scheduled agents and notifications, we’re now finally putting them into those project management databases. One hurdle though. Our admin team has, quite rightly, limited who can sign agents that will run on production servers.


Now, I’ve designed dozens or even hundreds of notification and reminder agents in many databases over the decades, but I always designed them from scratch, customizing it to the particular database and the particular recipients. I’d created a basic one and Ariwan Susey, who’s really coming up to speed on LotusScript and XPages, modified it for use in that project management database. This was nice, and Virginia Tauss had started creating copies of it, customized for each notice type. However, every time someone made a change to the half-dozen agents, I had to sign them. Since they were customized for their particular database and the particular recipients, this meant that eventually, I might spend all day signing agents instead of writing code.

Since the agents were almost the same, except for what view they used and who received the message, I realized that if I created a basic agent, they could use configuration documents to customize as many notices as they wanted and I’d never have to sign that configurable agent again!

Configuration Choices

There were a few basic things I knew would be different between each notification: the view, the recipients, the subject, the server to run on and the time to run. After creating some tests, I also realized that I wanted to emulate the scheduling choices of agents themselves and allow the user to select weekly or monthly notifications instead of just daily. I also remembered that sometimes, they would want to mark the document after they sent the notice, so I made that a configuration choice as well. Based on my recent experience in my Excel series (part 1, part 2, and the sample database) and with full-text queries, I realized we could use those full-text queries in these notifications as well.

So, here’s my form:

AutoNotify Configuration

Since I’ve been fiddling with DXL editing of forms lately, let me include the DXL for that third row for your review. The right cell contains a table for displaying the weekday or day of the month choices, with the hide-whens appropriately.

	<tablecell><par def='4'>Day(s) to run:</par></tablecell>
		<par def='5'>
			<field borderstyle='none' lookupeachchar='false' lookupaddressonrefresh='false'
			type='keyword' kind='editable' name='frequency'>
				<keywords helperbutton='false' recalconchange='true' columns='3' ui='radiobutton'>
		<table leftmargin='0' widthtype='fixedleft' refwidth='2.5000in'>
			<tablecolumn width='1in'/><tablecolumn width='1.5000in'/>
				<tablecell valign='center' borderwidth='0px'>
					<pardef id='6' spacebefore='1.5' keepwithnext='true' keeptogether='true'>
						<code event='hidewhen'><formula>frequency != "Weekly"</formula></code>
					<par def='6'>Day of week: </par>
				<tablecell valign='center' borderwidth='0px'>
					<pardef id='7' spacebefore='1.5' keepwithnext='true' keeptogether='true'>
						<code event='hidewhen'><formula>frequency != "Weekly"</formula></code>
					<par def='7'>
						<field usenotesstyle='false' height='0.2500in' width='1in' multiline='true'
						borderstyle='none' lookupeachchar='false' lookupaddressonrefresh='false'
						type='keyword' kind='editable' name='weekdayToRun'>
							<keywords helperbutton='false' columns='1' ui='combobox'>
				<tablecell valign='center' borderwidth='0px'>
					<pardef id='8' keepwithnext='true' keeptogether='true'>
						<code event='hidewhen'><formula>frequency != "Monthly"</formula></code>
					<par def='8'>Day of month:</par>
				<tablecell valign='center' borderwidth='0px'>
					<pardef id='9' keepwithnext='true' keeptogether='true'>
						<code event='hidewhen'><formula>frequency != "Monthly"</formula></code>
					<par def='9'>
						<field type='number' kind='editable' name='monthdayToRun'>
							<numberformat format='general' digits='2' punctuated='false' parens='false' percent='false'
							<code event='defaultvalue'><formula>1</formula></code>
							<code event='inputvalidation'><formula>@If ( frequency != "Monthly"; @Success; @ThisValue > 1 
								& @ThisValue < 29; @Success; @Failure ( "Must be in the first 28 days of the month"))</formula>
		<pardef id='10' keepwithnext='true' keeptogether='true'>
			<code event='hidewhen'><formula>frequency != "Monthly"</formula></code>
		<par def='10'><run><font size='1pt'/></run></par>

As I use the source view more in XPages, I get more and more comfortable with just editing code, and checking appearances occasionally. While I have only done a little of that in forms, I have used it several times in views. When I created this form, my initial design of it was done by creating a single in the normal designer form, then saving it, and re-opening it in DXL. Then I added several fields to a form with cut-and-paste for field names. Using the properties boxes just seemed like it would take so much longer – after all, I had the field names in my notepad already.

The Agent

Our agent is set to run hourly, on every server. If there are no autoNotify documents, it doesn’t do anything, but if there are, it checks each one for whether it runs on that server, on that day and at that hour.

Sub Initialize
Dim session As New NotesSession
' thisdb is declared in my utilities library, so not declared here '
Dim autoNotifyView As NotesView
Dim autoNotifyDoc As NotesDocument
Dim serverToRunOn As Variant
Dim hourToRun As Variant
Dim frequency As Variant
Dim weekdayToRun As Variant
Dim monthdayToRun As Variant
Dim noticeName As Variant
Dim hourNow As Integer
Dim weekdayToday As Integer
Dim monthdayToday As Integer
Dim reason As String

On Error GoTo errorhandler

Set thisdb = session.Currentdatabase
Call StartAgentLogging ( session )

Dim serverName As New NotesName ( thisdb.Server )

' get view of autonotify documents '
Set autoNotifyView = thisdb.Getview("AutoNotify")
Set autoNotifyDoc = autoNotifyView.Getfirstdocument()

While Not autoNotifyDoc Is Nothing
	' check server to run on '
	serverToRunOn = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("serverToRunOn")
	If ( Ucase ( serverToRunOn (0) ) = Ucase ( serverName.Common ) ) Then
		' check frequency and day '
		frequency = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("frequency")
		weekdayToRun = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("weekdayToRun")
		If ( weekdayToRun (0) = "" ) Then
			weekdayToRun (0) = "0"
		End If
		weekdayToday = Weekday ( Today )
		monthdayToRun = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("monthdayToRun")
		monthdayToday = Day ( Today )
		If ( frequency (0) = "Daily" or ( frequency (0) = "Weekly" And CInt (weekdayToRun (0)) = weekdayToday ) Or ( frequency (0) = "Weekly" And CInt ( monthdayToRun (0) ) = monthdayToday ) ) Then
			' check hour to run '
			hourToRun = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("schedule")
			hourNow = Hour (Now)
			If ( CInt ( hourToRun (0) ) = hourNow ) Then
				noticeName = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("NoticeName")
				If ( sendNotices ( autoNotifyDoc ) ) Then
					Call agentLog.LogAction ( noticeName (0) & " sent")
					Call agentLog.LogAction ( noticeName (0) & " FAILED")
				End If
			End If
		End If
	End If

	Set autoNotifyDoc = autoNotifyView.Getnextdocument(autoNotifyDoc)
Call agentLog.LogAction ( "Completed" )

	Exit Sub
errorhandler:' report all errors in a messagebox '
	reason = "Error #" & CStr (Err) & " (" & Error & ") on line " & CStr (Erl)
	MessageBox reason, 16, "Error"
	Call agentLog.LogAction ( reason )
	Resume exiting ' transfers control to the exiting label

End Sub

The actual notification builds off the values from the configuration document. At MWLUG, speakers recommended making sure to use functions instead of subroutines, partly because functions return a value and partly for forward compatible with other programming languages. So, my sendNotices function is a boolean, indicating success or failure.

The simplest, yet most powerful part of the script is the application of the querystring. By using that, I could create dozens of notifications from a single view, saving myself disk space by avoiding unnecessary view indices.

Ariwan’s great contribution to the basic agent that made it so useful in this configurable design was the use of columnvalues. The agent simply spits out the contents of the view, populating the message with the details of the document regardless of which fields are used. I’d never thought of doing that!

You’ll notice that in the loop, we get a handle to the nextdoc before processing. If the document would be removed from the view by marking one of the fields “Yes” and saving the document, we need to already have a handle to the next document. If we don’t do that, the view won’t be able to find the next document by referring to the current document, as it has no position in the view any more.

Now, since I want each notification to be processed even if I encounter some errors, I added error-handling in the function as well. If I had not, an error would bubble up to the Initialize routine and stop my agent. This way, it only stops that particular notification, but continues to the next one.

Function sendNotices ( autoNotifyDoc As NotesDocument ) As Boolean
Dim viewName As Variant
Dim recipientGroup As Variant
Dim subjectLine As Variant
Dim introText As Variant
Dim queryString As Variant
Dim flagField As Variant

Dim workingView As NotesView
Dim workingCollection As NotesDocumentCollection
Dim doc As NotesDocument
Dim nextdoc As NotesDocument
Dim memo As NotesDocument
Dim body As NotesRichTextItem
Dim reason As String
Dim count As Integer

sendNotices = false

' get viewName '
viewName = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue( "viewName" )
Set workingView = thisdb.Getview ( viewName (0) )
' apply query string, if there is one '
queryString = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue( "queryString" )
If ( queryString (0)<> "" ) Then
	Call workingView.Ftsearch(queryString(0), 0)
End If

Set doc = workingView.Getfirstdocument()

count = 0

Set memo = thisdb.Createdocument()
Set body = memo.Createrichtextitem(&quot;Body&quot;)
memo.Principal = thisdb.Title

' copy the introductory text from the autoNotify document into the email '
introText = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue( "introText" )
Call body.Appendtext ( introText(0) )
Call body.Addnewline(2)

While Not doc Is Nothing
	Set nextdoc = workingView.Getnextdocument(doc)
	count = count + 1
	Call body.Appendtext( CStr ( count ) & "." )
	Call body.Addtab(1)
	ForAll thing In doc.Columnvalues
		If ( IsArray ( thing ) ) Then
			Call body.Appendtext( Implode (thing, ", " ) )
			Call body.Appendtext( thing )    
		End If
		Call body.Addtab(1)
	End ForAll
	Call body.Appenddoclink(doc, "Open the doc", "Link")
	Call body.Addnewline(1)

	' if field to mark, then modify field and save doc '
	flagField = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue( "flagField" )
	If ( Trim ( flagField (0) ) <> "" ) Then
		Call agentLog.LogAction ( flagField (0) & " field #" & CStr ( count ) )
		Call doc.ReplaceItemValue ( flagField (0), "Yes" )
		Call doc.Save ( True, False )
	End If

	Set doc = nextdoc


subjectLine = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue( "subjectLine" )
memo.Subject = CStr (count) & " " & subjectLine (0)
recipientGroup = autoNotifyDoc.Getitemvalue("recipientGroup" )
Call memo.Send(False, DetermineKeyword ( recipientGroup(0)) )

sendNotices = True

	Exit Function
errorhandler:' report all errors in a messagebox '
	reason = "Error #" & CStr (Err) & " (" & Error & ") on line " & CStr (Erl)
	MessageBox reason, 16, "Error"
	Call agentLog.LogAction ( reason )
	Resume exiting ' transfers control to the exiting label '

End Function

It’s not quite perfect because if the server is down, it won’t run the notification later. I might take that into account in a future version, since many our project servers are in locations where power may not always be 24×7. Similarly, if someone puts too many notifications to run at the same time, the agent could time out, failing to run all of them.

Hopefully, this exercise proves useful to someone else. I can’t believe I spent more than a decade constantly re-writing the same code when I could have saved myself considerable time by just creating a customizable, reusable piece of code back in the day. Live and learn!


ThingFailsTurns out there was a bug in the code. The simple loop through the columnValues didn’t take into account multi-value fields. So, when the agent ran on a view with a document that had multiple values, it was trying to print a variant as text. So, I added a simple check for IsArray and imploded the multi-value field to build a comma-delimited string. That avoids the type mismatch that our script was throwing when it found those multi-value fields as shown at right in the debugger.

Categories: Old Notes, Utilities | Tags: , , , , | 1 Comment

MWLUG 2014 video series on Youtube

I took along my videocamera to MWLUG 2014 in Grand Rapids and I’ve created a playlist of the videos that I’ve already uploaded to Youtube. Since I’m a developer, it leans heavily on development sessions.

As more are added, they will appear there and here….

The playlist includes the following videos thus far:

AD104: Build A Bean Workshop – Devin Olson and Mike McGarel

BP107 Java versus Javascript: There really is no competition – Andrew Barickman

AD101: Achieving Developer Nirvana With Codename BlueMix – Ryan Baxter

AD105: Building a Structured App With XPages Scaffolding – Jesse Gallagher

Bonus track: WWII veteran Virgil Westdale in the Opening General Session

Other sessions are waiting on some approvals from the speakers and some editing (one session had live data displayed, so I have to edit that out)

These only give an impression of the event. You get an awful lot more out of it if you attend. So, see you in Atlanta next year!

Categories: Conferences, Java, Videos, Xpages | Tags: , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: